search

H4ckd4ddy / bypass-sentry-safe

530 stars 27 forks source link

Svlock samd21 support #2

Closed svlock closed 2 years ago

svlock commented 2 years ago

Small mods to get it compiling for SAMD21; now working on Seeeduino Xiao.

H4ckd4ddy commented 2 years ago

Hi 👋, thanks for your help, I just add byte prefix in commit 466ab4e4b1c0e5513024ebe3fb42bfca4d5b2074 for samd21 compatibility. Others vars names changes not seem mandatory. Best regards

svlock commented 2 years ago

Awesome, my first PR!

Yes, the rest of the changes were just personal. The byte operator is what kept it from compiling for me.

Excellent work on this!

Very strange way to develop an e-lock. UART with one obfuscated lead packet…? I guess that’s better than their e-lock which had the master code stored as a bar code on a sticker on the keypad PCB!

I’m a safe & vault mechanic and I mess around with a lot of electronic safe locks in my spare time (usually Type 1 UL locks). If you’re ever looking for another project, reach out. I’m happy to provide you with locks to play with.

Great job on this!

Sean

On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 7:33 AM Etienne Sellan @.***> wrote:

Hi 👋, thanks for your help, I just add byte prefix in commit 466ab4e https://github.com/H4ckd4ddy/bypass-sentry-safe/commit/466ab4e4b1c0e5513024ebe3fb42bfca4d5b2074 for samd21 compatibility. Others vars names changes not seem mandatory. Best regards

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/H4ckd4ddy/bypass-sentry-safe/pull/2#issuecomment-1159448754, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZUNITE2HWFTZYCRQBYEHODVPWXZHANCNFSM5Y2GX6IA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

H4ckd4ddy commented 2 years ago

Hi @svlock 👋,

Yes, that's a weird lock design. Thanks a lot for this proposal, let me know if you have any idea of a lock that would be interesting to bypass.

Thanks and have a great day.

Best regards