HBehrens / puncover

Analyses C/C++ build output for code size, static variables, and stack usage
MIT License
431 stars 94 forks source link

Use basename when computing stack usage #68

Closed noahp closed 1 year ago

noahp commented 1 year ago

Original patch from #43. Same approach as in #63.

This section of the code is covered by tests πŸ‘

I also did a quick spot check manually, looks good.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 81.75% // Head: 81.75% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (0f1fd12) compared to base (25557fb). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

:exclamation: Current head 0f1fd12 differs from pull request most recent head c7b8702. Consider uploading reports for the commit c7b8702 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #68 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 81.75% 81.75% ======================================= Files 11 11 Lines 1239 1239 ======================================= Hits 1013 1013 Misses 226 226 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/HBehrens/puncover/pull/68?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Heiko+Behrens) | Coverage Ξ” | | |---|---|---| | [puncover/collector.py](https://codecov.io/gh/HBehrens/puncover/pull/68/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Heiko+Behrens#diff-cHVuY292ZXIvY29sbGVjdG9yLnB5) | `74.75% <100.00%> (ΓΈ)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Heiko+Behrens). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Heiko+Behrens)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.