Open amit177 opened 1 year ago
Opened for community discussion
I think hard fork should be done if it seems to be needed for the change to be successful. At this point people have nothing to lose as the coin will die anyway.
Requiring node operators to upgrade may make people focus some (brief) attention on the coin.
I'm happy to run a node for a while.
If a hard fork is to be done, it may be worth considering what other changes would be prudent to be made at the same time.
Do people want to reduce interest rates again? Or will that unfairly advantage in favour of some huge whales?
Would be good to get a block explorer up and running again to see how many whales there are, how big they are and the distribution of coins to these wallets.
My transactions exceeded 600 millions after maturation so (value out of range). Do you think there will be actually a hard fork?If yes just loading the wallet.dat will be ok for the wallet to be functional again?
(If a hard fork is to be done, it may be worth considering what other changes would be prudent to be made at the same time.) Totally agree!!
It should be possible to split the MoneyRange check and allow the client to start properly without breaking the chain. @FreeTrade what do you think?
Sounds possible. Might be better to just do the fork though.
The coin inflation caused the following issues:
https://github.com/HOdlcoin/HOdlcoin/blob/af3b020d2f6250d4ee2592bb6f3289e498c84550/src/amount.h#L20
It appears this change will require a hard-fork:
https://github.com/HOdlcoin/HOdlcoin/blob/af3b020d2f6250d4ee2592bb6f3289e498c84550/src/main.cpp#L871-L873
A hard-fork might kill the coin completely since few people will update to that version. We need to decide what would be better.