search

HUPO-PSI / mzQC

Reporting and exchange format for mass spectrometry quality control data
https://hupo-psi.github.io/mzQC/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
27 stars 13 forks source link

For non-proteomics MS QC it would be nice to have .. #232

Open mwalzer opened 3 months ago

mwalzer commented 3 months ago

For starters, something like this:


 {
   "accession": "QC:4000257",
   "name": "Detected Compounds",
   "value": 57
}
mwalzer commented 3 months ago

We have this for starters:

[Term]
id: MS:4000102
name: number of detected quantification data points
def: "The number of data points detected for quantification purposes within the run. These data points may be for example XIC profiles, isotopic pattern areas, or reporter ions (see MS:1001805). The used type should be noted in the metadata or analysis methods section of the recording file for the respective run." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:4000003 ! single value
relationship: has_metric_category MS:4000009 ! ID free metric
relationship: has_metric_category MS:4000012 ! single run based metric
relationship: has_value_type xsd:int ! The allowed value-type for this CV term
relationship: has_units UO:0000189 ! count unit

[Term]
id: MS:4000103
name: number of identified quantification data points
def: "The number of identified data points for quantification purposes within the run after user defined acceptance criteria are applied.  These data points may be for example XIC profiles, isotopic pattern areas, or reporter ions (see MS:1001805). The used type should be noted in the metadata or analysis methods section of the recording file for the respective run. In case of multiple acceptance criteria (FDR) available in proteomics, PSM-level FDR should be used for better comparability." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:4000003 ! single value
relationship: has_metric_category MS:4000008 ! ID based metric
relationship: has_metric_category MS:4000012 ! single run based metric
relationship: has_value_type xsd:int ! The allowed value-type for this CV term
relationship: has_units UO:0000189 ! count unit

We'd need to document this better for someone in a field like say metabolomics to make the mental connection and get started.

mwalzer commented 3 months ago

But detected and identified components is just the start. What other 'usual suspects' are there?

bittremieux commented 3 months ago

We should take inspiration from established methods and tools in the field, such as: