Open sneumann opened 5 years ago
Same holds for SMILES. We may have intentionally left the particular flavor undefined, but the list is rather long: https://cdk.github.io/cdk/2.0/docs/api/index.html?org/openscience/cdk/smiles/SmiFlavor.html
Absolute, Canonical, Generic, CXSmiles and either InChILabelling or Universal (the latter for InCHI compatibility) seem to be the most appropriate ones. Any thoughts on that?
Currently we don't specify which InChI flavor should be provided in 6.5.6. inchi http://hupo-psi.github.io/mzTab/2_0-metabolomics-draft/mzTab_format_specification_2_0-M_draft.html#small-molecule-evidence-sme-section I talked to people from Recon, and it was suggested to suggest/prescribe
InChI=1S/...