Closed lukasz99 closed 4 years ago
The whole database branch needs thorough revision, I fully agree with this issue. I will devote some more time to revise the current classification and shuffle terms around and come back to you about this.
Both ECO and EDAM have been moved from being children of 'interaction database' to 'experiment database', which much more accurately describes the type of resources they really are.
On 11/19/19 8:43 AM, Pablo Porras wrote:
Both ECO and EDAM have been moved from being children of 'interaction database' to 'experiment database', which much more accurately describes the type of resources they really are.
looks better :o) thanks lukasz
ECO term (MI:1331)is described as :
Interaction database branch (MI:0461)is described as:
These two do not get together no matter how hard I try :o/ The same actually applies to psi-mi self-reference term (MI:0488) - both are describing ontologies, not interaction databases. Can they be moved out of interaction database branch either one level up to 'database' (then each is pretending to be a 'database' of terms, which seems to be somewhat ok) or to a new, more specific, 'controlled vocabulary' term within 'database' (MI:0444) with a definition that states, more or less,