Closed tomaas-zeman closed 3 months ago
This will not work without refactoring the workflow.
Based on the previous discussion #553 (comment)
* versions are also replaced in `README` links during release
I'm not sure if it's necessary. Readme evolves every time there's a release. We're not at the point where we need automation here. If anything, it should be a separate script, because I don't want to edit README when I build the release files. And you run it once for every language. And no, I don't want it to build every language on a single run, as a simple bash for loop will do. I want the capability to build a single language.
Based on the previous discussion #553 (comment)
* versions are also replaced in `README` links during release
I'm not sure if it's necessary. Readme evolves every time there's a release. We're not at the point where we need automation here. If anything, it should be a separate script, because I don't want to edit README when I build the release files. And you run it once for every language. And no, I don't want it to build every language on a single run, as a simple bash for loop will do. I want the capability to build a single language.
OK. I'll revert that change
Ok, the project builds now in TeXstudio, nicely done. Need somebody to test it on Windows 😂
@csagataj2 You were the one? Please share some good news with us and tell us if it builds.
@qwrtln It seems that job config change also changed the structure of checks and the deprecated ones are not running now, yet they still seem to be required
@qwrtln It seems that job config change also changed the structure of checks and the deprecated ones are not running now, yet they still seem to be required
Required checks are picked manually in the repo settings, to which only the owner has access. Since the jobs evolved (matrix has different params now), old ones need to be deleted and the new ones selected. We shall do it once we have confirmation that everything's working as intended.
@csagataj2 You were the one? Please share some good news with us and tell us if it builds.
It works as intended
@csagataj2 You were the one? Please share some good news with us and tell us if it builds.
It works as intended
I'm glad we're leaving this window of opportunity open for everyone
@Heegu-sama We need your help here. Those yellow required checks which won't run now need to go away. They should be replaced by those which run successfully, but are not labelled as required.
Based on the previous discussion https://github.com/Heegu-sama/Homm3BG/pull/553#discussion_r1626067929
.version
file and not parsed from the documentversions are also replaced inREADME
links during release