Closed akuckartz closed 9 years ago
Yes, I agree. Sorry for not having read that paragraph in the VoID specification. I only had searched for the property name in it :-(
But that illustrates that it can help to be a bit more verbose in the documentation of a property so that it can stand for itself - especially when a term ("total number") is not used according to the usual semantics ! Maybe that can be considered for a future version of the VoID specification.
According to http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/triple-pattern-fragments/ the object of the property
void:triples
isBut http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ states:
And that document states for
void:documents
:That seems to substantiate that
void:triples
was intended for precise numbers, not estimates.In October 2014 there was a mail thread where a different opinion was presented:
totalItems vs void:triples [mail thread] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Oct/0048.html
I think it would be better to define and use a new property
hydra:estimatedTiples
orhydra:triplesEstimate
. Maybe that property can be defined as a super-property ofvoid:triples
.