FY19Q3 Fast Follow or FY19Q4 To Do List

[jb3436]

Cross Cutting Issues

FY19Q3 Clean

• [ ] Global Versions of single OU dossiers
• [ ] PSNU needs to be added and drop SNU2 and SNU3 for performance issues
• [ ] Male and female colors applied backwards in a few places. Males = purple and females = teal. in new dossiers, colors applied htis way, in older ones it is flipped.
• [ ] Color Scheme
• [ ] Inclusion of Notes
• [ ] Selector Location
• [ ] Symmetry

FY19Q4

• [ ] Org Level Selector Agency Selection and the inclusion of Dedup in visuals or not - need to be consistent across dossiers
  • First 90
  • Second 90
  • Third 90 excludes dedup by applying a filter on the visualization
  • HSS
  • DREAMS
  • Clinical Cascade (Single,Global, Site)
  • Apply decision to all new Q4 development
• [ ] Find solutions to unclump scatter plot visuals
• [ ] Should we add DSD/TA filter in the levels selectors for country teams that still review that info? Case study = Cameroon (nicole)

[jb3436]

Q4 Development Considerations

• [ ] Provide default preferences for chapter filters, page selectors, and visuals etc for each page
• [ ] Develop a training on process and steps Emulate QC process earlier Think of style guide temporality

Update Deprecation list for FY19Q4 Pano Dashboards being transitioned to Dossier

1. OVC Dashboard --> OVC Dossier
2. Treatment summary dashboard --> 2nd 90 Dossier
3. Treatment continuum --> 2nd 90 Dossier
4. Gend GBV Dashboard --> Prevention Dossier
5. PMTCT Cascade Dashboard ---> PMTCT Dossier
6. VMMC Dashboard --> Prevention Dossier
7. TB/HIV Testing Dashboard --> TB Dossier

[jb3436]

Dossier Specific Formatting Updates for FY19Q3 Clean

• [ ] DREAMS: make sure values for PMTCT_STAT targets in dreams dossier are correct.

• [ ] CC Dossiers: Add a note for what the age/sex charts are visualizing - to QC the HTS TST POS visual you have to filter to 15+ and take out N/A facilities need to add a note to all visuals that do this iin the CC dossiers so it is easily replicable and transparent what we are viewing

• [ ] HSS Dossier:

  • [ ] Can we exclude HRH_CURR, and TX_NET NEW? There are no targets for these indicators so achievement in blank (this could be for a FF)? [JH] - There is no clean way to filter the selector in a page that would not affect other visuals. We can brainstorm on options for next release.
  • [ ] CH: HRH Support Overview, Pg. 4: HRH Staff Provider patient ratio. "comment has a typo - it should say text where Provider Patient ratio is hovering in bottom right hand corner. not test

• [x] PreP Dossier - "Pg 3: Prep Use Segmented by..."Suggestion - remove KP_PREV from the chart on the right and put it with the other "context setting indicators/denominators on the left - so the left chart will show the breakdown by HTS and KP, then the chart on the right, we will be able to see the distribution in PrEP CURR and NEW, which are obscured by the large volumne of KP PREV at the moment. (Janice was able to do this already!)

[jb3436]

Genie Related Comment - Not Pano related - will move to DAQ

• [ ] In genie can we get a filter for standardized disaggregate?

[jb3436]

Review Comments from Jamie on Clinical Cascades

Need to make sure they are 100% for the fast follow

Email Subject: FYI.. this is just from the overview page in the single OU CC Clinical Cascade:

1) Overview:

A) For the top left graphic the results are missing unknown age and aggregated age for HTS_TST (likely for all indicators) but its represent as HTS_TST – N. Why not just use the Total Numerator disag here?

B) Yield in index testing proxy cascade appears to be for all modalities not just for index testing

2) Overview cascade, totals sum Fine/Coarse/Retired age bands together. Technically correct, but confusing user interface, suggest N/A be used instead (often used in MSD since its the Total Numerator if you exclude KP data)

2) Disag completeness: Highlighted previously

[jb3436]

Deprecation Discussion for FY19Q4

Now that the org level selectors work well and we have Partner IM filters on each dossier, can we deprecate the "agency and Geography" versions of the clinical cascade?

I think we should keep the below three and refine them and deprecate the rest:

1. Single OU
2. Site level (until it can be merged with single OU)
3. Global

Deprecate

• [ ] Agency/Partner --> no longer any additional value
• [ ] Geography --> no longer any additional value
• [ ] MAYBE -- Age/sex --> this has some value

Rationale:

• A lot of work to maintain and QC them and improve all 6 of them
• There are new features that allow us to consolidate the functions from these dossiers into the others
• Partner Verstion: Currently if I select 6 USAID partners, I am unable to see who contributes what. It only has value by looking one partner at a time, and this can be done in the Single and Global CCs by selecting the partner IM filter, which is now working well.
• Geography version: the only geographic filter is Prioritization, and we can add that as part of the levels selector or an additional selector to the other dossiers. Much less work to maintain.
• Age/Sex Dossier can also be retired when teh age/sex levels selectors are applied to single, Global, and site level dossier. Easier to add that than to maintain another dossier.
  • Though I see that it could be nice to just look at one age/sex group in this dossier.... to discuss.

[jb3436]

Follow Up on:

Data Tables in General Age and Sex Disaggregates Table Secifically Single OU pepfar-datim/Analytics#2205 Global pepfar-datim/Analytics#2206