Kevin-diesel-1194
commented
11 months ago Thank you Null Wranglers for your valuable feedback, we will correct our mistakes and implement them in future presentations.
Closed kmanasil closed 11 months ago
Kevin-diesel-1194
commented
11 months ago Thank you Null Wranglers for your valuable feedback, we will correct our mistakes and implement them in future presentations.
The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by [name of team completing peer review]. The team members that participated in this review are
[Kristi Manasil] - @[kmanasil]
[Anjani Sowmya Bollapragada] - @[asbollapragada]
[Utkarsha Patil] - @[utkarshapatil01]
[Rohith Hemaraja] - @[rohith-hemaraja]
...
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? Yes the question and data were nicely connected.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? Yes while some labels were small they gave good explanations of the images.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
While the team did mention that they ended up changing their project, they did seem to do a decent analysis in a short time frame.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.? Some labels were a little small and some slides seemed text heavy.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
They ran way over the time allowed, and one presenter stood in front of the slides and often had their back to the audience and made it hard to see/hear what he was saying.