Open isotc211 opened 3 years ago
The two terms in this statement are logically equivalent. Not a problem.
The two terms in this statement are logically equivalent. Not a problem.
The two terms in this statement are logically equivalent. Not a problem.
Justification: REQ.238 says Edge has association role "boundary", but it should be "node", according to the UML.
Also, formal definition should be modified, too. Proposal: third line of REQ.238: from : with association role boundary.... to : with association role node....
formal definition: from: boundary:DirectedNode[2] to: node:DirectedNode[2]