[x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.
Yes, he was a key contributor. Showed multiple commits consistently throughout the span of the project.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[ 0.84] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
[0.86 ] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
[0.9 ] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
[ 0.9] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.
0.88/0.9
Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
I like the sheer amount of commits you had, showed that you're actually working. Also your plans were detailed and showed your work over the week, so overall good stuff keep coding. The binary decrypter/encrypter is very impressive, and a very good feature overall. I can tell it took some effort to learn how to develop one.
Possible improvements:
Provide user with more feedback when password is encrypted or decrypted. Add like a pop up message or something, a cool idea/addition that I believe would be good.
Second Improvement would be to make stricter plans with daily goals, so that your whole team is more methodical and organized and can work efficiently.
Individual Review Anvay Yadav grading Imaad
Yes, he was a key contributor. Showed multiple commits consistently throughout the span of the project.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[ 0.9] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.
0.88/0.9
Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
I like the sheer amount of commits you had, showed that you're actually working. Also your plans were detailed and showed your work over the week, so overall good stuff keep coding. The binary decrypter/encrypter is very impressive, and a very good feature overall. I can tell it took some effort to learn how to develop one.
Possible improvements:
Provide user with more feedback when password is encrypted or decrypted. Add like a pop up message or something, a cool idea/addition that I believe would be good.
Second Improvement would be to make stricter plans with daily goals, so that your whole team is more methodical and organized and can work efficiently.