Remove customise a node tutorial

[barneydobson]

Remove the tutorial, fix a formatting issue. New recommendations on node customisation will be given by #111

Fixes #113

Discussion

• I'm not going to remove the code of the examples in case it is potentially useful. I don't know if we want to add like an 'archived tutorials' folder that we can say 'these still work but are not best practice' in case people think there is something useful in them?

[barneydobson]

@dalonsoa any idea what's causing the tests to fail? this seems to be across multiple repos that this has started happening (and if I rerun old tests that were passing they now fail). I fixed it on another repo with below, but that's just chatgpt whatever, I don't actually know what is happening.

[dalonsoa]

Yep. pre-commit action is failing everywhere due to recent updates to "something". Unclear what. The maintainer is pretty rude, so we are all pretty pissed.

In any case, being this repo public, you don't need to use pre-commit action. Just delete that action altogether and I'll setup pre-commit.ci, as we did with SWMManywhere.

[dalonsoa]

I've just done it myself. It should all work, now, and run pre-commit via pre-commit.ci.

[barneydobson]

Yeah - I mean i know that nothing is lost on git, but I can envisage it being useful at one point or another (and if it's on the repo it will be somewhat findable). If you think that makes no sense then see description suggestion of a guide archive?

[dalonsoa]

Sorry, I missed that part of the description. I'd personally ditch the file altogether. If it is not best practice, we should not even show how it is done. But up to you.

If you do so, put them in an archive subfolder and, within, a README.md file explaining this.

[barneydobson]

OK tbh it may cause more harm than good RE confusion