Closed MekDrop closed 3 years ago
It seems that this change is possible after we change license to Impresscms otherwise we will have some legal issues with this.
There was a LOT of pushback when we first tried even just altering the headers in files without changing the license.
@skenow that was because we restructured files that were originally coming from Xoops. This is stuff we started by ourselves, so I don't see why we cannot license the composer installer as MIT.
@fiammybe problem right now that we somehow need to access impresscms constants from this library - how to do that not including all ImpressCMS and also same license I don't know :(
License file has license for GPLv2 but composer.json said that we use MIT.
Because MIT for using free components in commercial products, I decided that MIT would be better for us for that.
Do, you agree? :)