Open RobertSpang opened 4 months ago
We understand, that the format already contains a field which is "owner of the EPD" and in the field "use advice for the dataset" the sites covered shall be described. So from our perspective no action is required at the moment.
The discussion arrives at a point where both the names and addresses of the manufacturers (legal entity) are to be declared as well as the production sites (geo coordinates).
Proposal: we are allowing a list of manufacturers and nested for each manufacturer the productions sites can be declared using geo coordinates and optionally street address. Site ID and manufacturer ID to be included.
addresses https://github.com/InDataWG/ILCD-EPD-Data-Format/issues/18, #22 and https://github.com/InDataWG/ILCD-EPD-Data-Format/issues/23
manufacturers
Goods and products have a manufacturer, sometimes even more than one. That is the case, if a product is developed
Optional
multiple
The contact should include a operator id.
Should include facility id, geodata and street adress
I raise this change request because...
Problem description
the name and address of the manufacturer(s) shall be mentioned. Is most probably not covered at the moment, since it could vary from C2.3 data set generator and C3.8 owner of the data set
Solution description
Check if new field is needed and how we would deal with large assiciations
Relevance or added value
Medium relevance