InDataWG / ILCD-EPD-Data-Format

Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

EN 15804+A2, chapter 7.1, a), the name and address of the manufacturer(s) #20

Open RobertSpang opened 4 months ago

RobertSpang commented 4 months ago

I raise this change request because...

Problem description

the name and address of the manufacturer(s) shall be mentioned. Is most probably not covered at the moment, since it could vary from C2.3 data set generator and C3.8 owner of the data set

Solution description

Check if new field is needed and how we would deal with large assiciations

Relevance or added value

Medium relevance

RobertSpang commented 3 months ago

We understand, that the format already contains a field which is "owner of the EPD" and in the field "use advice for the dataset" the sites covered shall be described. So from our perspective no action is required at the moment.

okworx commented 1 month ago

The discussion arrives at a point where both the names and addresses of the manufacturers (legal entity) are to be declared as well as the production sites (geo coordinates).

Proposal: we are allowing a list of manufacturers and nested for each manufacturer the productions sites can be declared using geo coordinates and optionally street address. Site ID and manufacturer ID to be included.

addresses https://github.com/InDataWG/ILCD-EPD-Data-Format/issues/18, #22 and https://github.com/InDataWG/ILCD-EPD-Data-Format/issues/23

1aun commented 1 month ago

Use for (incl. reference to standard, section/subsection)

Don't user for

Suggested Name (if e.g. a single new field is requested)

manufacturers

Suggested Locations within ILCD

Description of context

Goods and products have a manufacturer, sometimes even more than one. That is the case, if a product is developed

Occurrence

Optional

Cardinality

multiple

Content / Data

A reference to a contact data set

The contact should include a operator id.

Site data

Should include facility id, geodata and street adress

Constraints