Open KevinHaleydt opened 3 years ago
The URI's are indeed correct but ISO just hasn't published them yet. What's stopping them from doing that I do not know, but our main purpose here is to identify our data-elements as ISO-compliant. That it is until now not possible to resolve the URI's is something that only will become annoying if some client application wants to explore the terms at runtime. Nevertheless, I would also prefer them to be resolvable.
A good number of ISO O&M URIs are used in the model but don't seem to exist. The URIs are correct according to the documentation (https://github.com/ISO-TC211/GOM), but don't seem to resolve.
SOSA's Observation is defined as a subclass of the ISO definition, so is there any reason why not just the SOSA version is used?