Closed JBenda closed 3 years ago
Fair point, but isn't this with ink-proof kind of redundant? I will implement some test ^^ (soon TM)
I guess I'm not sure how extensively ink-proof would test problem cases in this algorithm.
Something like comparing (& is string append)
4 & 55 & "hello" with 45 & "5hello"
Is the kind of case you'd want to write a test for knowing how your algorithm works. It's not the kind of test ink-proof is going to have.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:28 AM JBenda notifications@github.com wrote:
Fair point, but isn't this with ink-proof kind of redundant? I will implement some test ^^ (soon TM)
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/brwarner/inkcpp/pull/15#issuecomment-776570470, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIAEVDZUJQ2LJRT3OSLIG3S6JGUZANCNFSM4XJLD55A .
Try to accomplish as much InkProofnes with the current feature set as possible.