Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
the reasoning behind this is to lower cpu usage, however, should really be
calculating and comparing Content-MD5 anyway to verify end to end integrity
Original comment by rri...@gmail.com
on 11 Aug 2008 at 5:21
Ben, can you comment on this one as you have been working on the cache
function. Thanks. Dan
Original comment by dmoore4...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2011 at 5:13
I like the idea of this because it potentially fixes issue 160 and removes a
few crypto requirements. I'll see what I can come up with.
Original comment by ben.lema...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2011 at 5:40
see r338
I'm happy with the results of this change which did end up fixing #160 as well.
The change requires the locally cached file mtime to be hacked in order to
match that of the file we uploaded/downloaded from s3.
Original comment by ben.lema...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 12:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rri...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2008 at 12:39