Closed stestoll closed 4 years ago
The ex_models
must have some hard-coded starting values and bounds for the refocusing times of some dipolar pathways. Very good estimations of this starting values and boundaries can be inferred from t
, especially the bounds.
I do not see right now a clean way to hard-code these boundaries without needing t
, but ensuring that they still make physical sense.
The alternative would be to let all refocusing times almost unbounded (e.g. all positive-valued times), with some numerically default starting value.
There's an analogy to the distribution models here: Good estimates for the bounds for location parameters in dd_
models would also depend on the r
range. But for dd_
models, we currently do not require r
to be supplied for the info = dd_mode()
call.
Currently, experiment models take the time axis
t
as their first input. Some of the models (such asexp_5pdeer
) use this to set default parameter ranges for the refocusing times of secondary pathways, while other (such asex_4pdeer
) disregard it.If the purpose of experiment models is to convert input parameters to the
pathinfo
structure, then I think they should be independent oft
.