codecov-commenter
commented
6 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
b1d3387) 36.42% compared to head (9e1706c) 45.22%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #72 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 36.42% 45.22% +8.79% ========================================== Files 18 17 -1 Lines 442 356 -86 ========================================== Hits 161 161 + Misses 281 195 -86 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Closes #71
This adds a new page "Developers docs" that outlines how to contribute new pipelines to the software.
Additionally, I renamed the abstract types, and the core documentation strings, to talk about only two things: "changes" and "statistically significant changes" the latter being equivalent with "transitions".
I wanted to move away from referring to "indicators" all the time, as we have already discussed that sometimes an indicator is not used, only a change metric is used.