search

Juris-M / jm-styles

Juris-M styles: extended CSL styles with jurisdiction support
67 stars 24 forks source link

Major update #11

Closed sam-gagnon closed 3 years ago

sam-gagnon commented 3 years ago

I have done extensive work on the Canada style module, the McGill style, the CanLII translator, and the Canada LRR entry.

All four of these are meant to work together, and so preferably would all be merged into the main Juris-M branch.

Next, I plan to add more item type support, as well as other translators. However, the base case format is pretty much set in stone at this point and isn't likely to change.

bwiernik commented 3 years ago

@georgd Do these look okay to you?

georgd commented 3 years ago

@georgd Do these look okay to you?

I can’t say anything about correctness wrt the style manual.

~It looks good, as far as I can see, however, I’m seeing incorrect output with EU and AT case law. This shouldn’t hinder this update but I’ll investigate what is happening there. It’s not clear to me for now on which side this is failing, not necessarily the style.~

Edit: Found it. The style currently calls style-modules only for CA.

sam-gagnon commented 3 years ago

@georgd Do these look okay to you?

I can’t say anything about correctness wrt the style manual.

~It looks good, as far as I can see, however, I’m seeing incorrect output with EU and AT case law. This shouldn’t hinder this update but I’ll investigate what is happening there. It’s not clear to me for now on which side this is failing, not necessarily the style.~

Edit: Found it. The style currently calls style-modules only for CA.

Yes, sorry about that. McGill is primarily for CA decisions. There is a section of the manual with specific formating for the various commonwealth and international jurisdictions, but those haven't been implemented yet. Proper calls to other style-modules will be made once other jurisdiction are implemented down the line.