Needed New Nodes

[KerbalKore]

BDB

• [x] Atlas II
• [x] Atlas III
• [x] Centaur 2
• [x] Common Centaur/Centaur III
• [x] SLV-3X
• [x] Titan III
• [x] LDC
• [x] Incremental Delta
• [x] Delta 6000
• [x] Delta 7000
• [x] Delta 8000
• [x] Delta Upper Stages (for the AJ10 Varints and Delta-P fairing. Delta K leads from this)

[KerbalKore]

So i got some of the atlas and centaur nodes done, but the positioning has to change. Tonight I'll make a test install of KSP and try this out.

[KerbalKore]

AAAAND I JUST REALIZED I AM EDITING THE TREE.CFG IN MASTER AND NOT IN TREEFIXES

[KerbalKore]

[KerbalKore]

hope is not lost

[KerbalKore]

Crisis averted

[KerbalKore]

I was also thinking about the tree design in general. Would it be more work to keep it in the style its in currently, or to make it something like this? The design i just proposed would enable us to standardize node positions, thereby making it easier to add more nodes.

[KerbalKore]

Considering merging Early Aviation and Nazi Rocketry into one node, something like "Post-War Hardware" for those who want a rocket start instead of having to do planes

[KerbalKore]

So a bunch of the nodes are done, but they have a bad habit of breaking the game. #24

[DeltaDizzy]

Does Delta IV already have a node?

[KerbalKore]

@DeltaDizzy yes it does