Cuda8 or cuda91

[d0n4ald]

which one do i use for windows 10, 1080ti/1070ti?

[d0n4ald]

ok well itried cuda 91....seems to be running ok, i got these messages at the start....is it ok? [2018-01-28 16:17:12] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1499.38 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:17:12] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 2659.89 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:17:13] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1482.35 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:17:13] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1428.62 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:17:13] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 3414.54 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:17:13] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 3414.54 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:17:14] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:14] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:14] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1279.21 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 4207.21 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU! [2018-01-28 16:17:15] GPU #2: Nonce $AB2E8AF5 does not validate on CPU!

[KlausT]

No, that's not ok. Is the card overclocked?

[d0n4ald]

yes, 80%tdp/135core/700mem

its been running for a few minutes now...i havent got those messages again...

[2018-01-28 16:20:16] accepted: 106/107 (99.07%), 4215.44 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:31] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1266.63 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:31] accepted: 107/108 (99.07%), 4215.37 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:36] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1469.32 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:36] accepted: 108/109 (99.08%), 4215.55 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:37] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1256.95 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:38] accepted: 109/110 (99.09%), 4215.15 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:41] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1268.47 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:41] accepted: 110/111 (99.10%), 4214.80 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:41] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1479.78 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:42] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1476.05 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:42] accepted: 111/112 (99.11%), 4215.10 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:20:43] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1479.58 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:20:43] accepted: 112/113 (99.12%), 4214.42 kH/s yay!!! [2018-01-28 16:21:01] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1463.17 kH/s

[d0n4ald]

my hash rates improved over using ccminer2.2.4...i was getting 3800kh with that

[d0n4ald]

also in the beginning i got this for like a minute. does that mean connectivity issue>? i am in the US and altminer is in the EU i guess. I wonder if its lag time. i noticed with ccminer2.2.4 it was also slow to start. sometimes i had to restart the program a few times.

[2018-01-28 16:16:41] GPU #1: waiting for data [2018-01-28 16:16:41] GPU #2: waiting for data [2018-01-28 16:16:41] MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! [2018-01-28 16:16:41] Stratum difficulty set to 64 [2018-01-28 16:16:44] GPU #1: waiting for data [2018-01-28 16:16:44] GPU #0: waiting for data [2018-01-28 16:16:44] GPU

[KlausT]

That's mostly because the pool is overloaded / slow

[d0n4ald]

so far running over 23 minutes, ok

[2018-01-28 16:39:17] eu1.altminer.net:1100 neoscrypt block 10128 [2018-01-28 16:39:17] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1471.58 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:17] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1464.97 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:17] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1267.98 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:42] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1473.82 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:42] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1070 Ti, 1268.41 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:42] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1465.57 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:44] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 1475.81 kH/s [2018-01-28 16:39:44] accepted: 221/224 (98.66%), 4196.47 kH/s yay!!!

[lowenheart]

its better using cuda 9.1 or Cuda 8 if I'm using 1070ti? I using 1750w PSU but when I using 8.19 pre, the cuda 9.1 almost 1950w with watt meter and my rig got restart. but in 8.19 cuda 9.1 I didn't got restart. so what the best cuda for 1070ti? thx

[d0n4ald]

i used cuda 91 on windows 10. no problem.

[lowenheart]

i used cuda 9.1 more slower dan cuda 8 :(

[KlausT]

It depends on your system and the algo. Sometimes 9.1 is faster, other times 8.0 is faster. If your PSU is at the limit you could try the --plimit option.

[lowenheart]

thx u klautz

[kaos-1]

Cuda 9.1 x64 version on windows 10 and latest nvidia drivers is faster then cuda 8 on Neoscript.

[newmzy]

I seem to get better results (i.e. hash rate) using v8.19 rather than v8.20 when mining neoscrypt - or is that just a random thing? Was any part of the neoscrypt algo code changed between v8.19 and v8.20?

[KlausT]

The neoscrypt code has not been changed