As gbif:9180402owl:sameAs_:node1evgqka3hx9 is a reification and not a fact, could we add this as a reification statement? Would be an interesting experiment. The modelling seems a bit more straightforward in RDF*, but still this seems like a good way to keep track of provenance of statements.
As
gbif:9180402
owl:sameAs
_:node1evgqka3hx9
is a reification and not a fact, could we add this as a reification statement? Would be an interesting experiment. The modelling seems a bit more straightforward in RDF*, but still this seems like a good way to keep track of provenance of statements.ex:statementIRI a rdf:Statement; dcterms:creator orcid:0000-0002-2146-4803; rdf:subject gbif:9180402; rdf:predicate owl:sameAs; rdf:object _:node1evgqka3hx9 .
_Originally posted by @lisestork in https://github.com/LINNAE-project/SFB-Annotator/pull/84#discussion_r587321484_