Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by christop...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2014 at 4:57
Attachments:
Hi Christoph,
thanks for figuring that out. Simply removing the call to the native
N_UpdateUI(..) doesn't fix your issue (see attached image). Other components
like Java's progress bar still paint over the layered pane (e.g. if you press
"reload").
Beside that it would break the fix for the two problems described on issue 104.
To verify this, simply apply one of the patches testcase1 or testcase2 to
simple MainFrame.java.
Btw: If you remove the call to N_UpdateUI(..) you will break the implementation
for Mac as well. Please keep that in mind.
I think it is important to fix issue 104 as well as this issue 120. Not either
issue 104 or issue 120. Do you have any ideas how to deal with that? Maybe
there is another good approach to update the position, size as well as the
clipping of the native browser overlay?
Have you tried to use OSR? Maybe this could be a workaround until a solution
for this is found.
Original comment by k...@censhare.de
on 23 Sep 2014 at 5:22
Attachments:
Hi Kai:
Thanks for feedback. Regarding your screenshot, using JLayeredPane.DRAG_LAYER
instead of JLayeredPane.DEFAULT_LAYER fixes the pb you noticed. So the patch to
ControlPanel.java becomes:
ControlPanel.java
reloadButton_.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
+ {
+ JFrame frame = (JFrame)SwingUtilities.getRoot(ControlPanel.this);
+ JPanel fastView = new JPanel(new FlowLayout());
+ fastView.setBackground(Color.RED);
+ fastView.setBounds(0, 50, 200, 600);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ fastView.add(new JButton("Button "+i));
+ frame.getLayeredPane().add(fastView, JLayeredPane.DRAG_LAYER);
+ }
if (reloadButton_.getText().equalsIgnoreCase("reload")) {
Then AWT/Swing get the Z-order right for their components, even when resizing
or giving focus to the different areas. But the Cef browser forces its region
over the others.
Yes, Mac is currently in the backburner in our project due to unrelated defect
109 (we're a JavaWebStart app, not a native bundled app). But certainly will
keep it in mind.
Luckily in our product we don't have to make the CefBrowser work on the sides
of a border layout, we can parent it as a single child of a JPanel and stick to
CENTER. But we have these fast views that must stay on top... Since overlapping
can create arbitrary shapes (aka a region), that clearly becomes tricky to
solve without being part of the AWT team itself.
For now, we can live with disabling part of issue 104 in our own code. Native
WR works so much better than OSR for us (performance, WebGL support,
mouse/keyboard (caret actually blinks!)) we decided OSR was not appropriate for
us. So no rush to fix this complex problem. If it bothers me a lot, I might
provide a patch to have a flag (clipping or z-order preference...) until we get
everything right.
Original comment by christop...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 2:59
The fix for issue 104 in revision 100 also has introduced issue 121. We can
pursue discussion on issue 121 over there.
Original comment by christop...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 6:53
Layering light-weight Swing components on top of heavy-weight AWT components
has always been problematic. Have you considered implementing the overlay as
web content (via JavaScript injected into the browser) instead of trying to do
it with Swing overlays?
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2014 at 4:41
In our case, we have a large legacy Java app and these overlapping Swing panes
can't be rewritten. If these were new features, we'd have more freedom...
It's true LW/HW wasn't supported for a long time by Sun/Oracle, but it has gone
much much better starting with 1.6 and 1.7. e.g.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4811096 . It works pretty well as long
as components are opaque.
I might have to add a flag to avoid the SetWindowRgn code introduced in issue
104. Or find a workaround that works for everyone, but it's certainly is a
tricky pb to get right on the different platforms.
Original comment by christop...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2014 at 5:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
christop...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2014 at 4:48