Open rezo552 opened 2 years ago
I believe this doesn't depend on the drive but depends on the version of LTFS.
Which LTFS version are you using on /ltfs
?
From the log of ltfs_ordered_copy
, it doesn't detect specified files is not on the LTFS.
On disk sources: 1058
Source tapes: 0
Copying on 1058 disk files with 8 threads
File copy from disk is on going: 17/1058
The LTFS you are using needs to return a correct data against VEAs, ltfs.volumeUUID
, ltfs.partition
and ltfs.startblock
. (In Linux, user.
prefix is required like user.ltfs.volumeUUID
)
Once ltfs_ordered_copy
capture those info, it tries to reorder the source files by ltfs.startblock
. As a result, seek might be minimized.
The code below is your reference.
Im using this version: rezo@pop-os:~$ ltfs -V LTFS version 2.5.0.0 (Prelim). LTFS Format Specification version 2.4.0.
Does it matter if the drive was NOT written with ltfs_order_copy?
If Im copying to the tape it seems to detect LTFS
Tape order aware copy for LTFS Destination /ltfs is LTFS On disk sources: 15082 Source tapes: 0 Copying on 15082 disk files with 1 threads File copy from disk is on going: 630/15082
I would like to check the LTFS returns VEA correctly.
Could you try the commands below against a source file ?
Linux:
attr -g ltfs.volumeUUID [srcfile]
attr -g ltfs.partition [srcfile]
attr -g ltfs.ltfs.startblock [srcfile]
Mac:
xattr -p ltfs.volumeUUID [srcfile]
xattr -p ltfs.partition [srcfile]
xattr -p ltfs.ltfs.startblock [srcfile]
now I got it working
root@pop-os:/home/rezo# find /ltfs -type f | ./ltfs_ordered_copy -t /smbnasusb --keep-tree=/ltfs Tape order aware copy for LTFS Destination /smbnasusb is not LTFS
On disk sources: 0 Source tapes: 1 Processing tape b2ce8374-7e34-41a7-bf1a-818171a69993, Partition b Sorting 15083 files on b2ce8374-7e34-41a7-bf1a-818171a69993 (b) Copying files on b2ce8374-7e34-41a7-bf1a-818171a69993 (b) File copy from tape is on going: 15083/15083 Copied 15083 files.
The issue was with the xattr python library, some functions are renamed
Thank you for your investigation. And it is interesting...
I confirmed the functions you pointed out was obsoleting from v0.4. So it is a time to with to new functions as you fixed. I will do that in the near future.
for me on python 3.9, without this change the script just breaks and will not run
python3-xattr is already the newest version (0.9.7-1+b1).
module "xattr" has no attribute "get"
Thank you for your investigation. And it is interesting...
I confirmed the functions you pointed out was obsoleting from v0.4. So it is a time to with to new functions as you fixed. I will do that in the near future.
@rezo552 , @Nooby1
I tried to work this today but I realize something funny. From the document of pyxattr module, getxattr()
and setxattr()
is obsoleting from v0.4.. -> See https://pyxattr.k1024.org/module.html#module-xattr
The ltfs_ordered_copy
requires the pyxattr
module and it is described here.
Could you confirm you are using the pyxattr
module? I would like to note that there is another module xattr
to handle extended attribute.
pyxattr
module -> https://pypi.org/project/pyxattr/xattr
module -> https://pypi.org/project/xattr/I was using the xattr module, not pyxattr, the script seems to work with some small changes with xattr however
can you provide the edit verion of the script please? on freebsd its just broken nomatter what i try :/
Hi,
Im still trying to understand what is the best way to retrieve files in batch from LTFS. The ltfs_ordered_copy takes ages to retrieve couple of hundreds of megs and it seems the drive is constantly seeking. Are HP drives supported at all? Thanks
Z.
After 40 minutes, I was only able to retrieve 17 files (cca. 20 megs each)