LucidDB / luciddb

DEFUNCT: See README
https://github.com/LucidDB/luciddb
Apache License 2.0
52 stars 24 forks source link

[FRG-19] initBuild.sh --without-fennel failed. #851

Closed dynamobi-build closed 12 years ago

dynamobi-build commented 12 years ago

[reporter="fliang", created="Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:45:02 -0500 (GMT-05:00)"] initBuild.sh --without-fennel failed.


-----------------------
BUILD FAILED
/home/fliang/open/farrago/build.xml:429: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/fliang/open/farrago/build.xml:558: Test net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoSqlTest failed

---------------------------------------
Test log:

Testsuite: net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoSqlTest
Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 4.094 sec

Testcase: unknown took 0 sec
        Caused an ERROR
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
net.sf.farrago.util.FarragoUtil$FarragoSqlException: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at net.sf.farrago.fennel.FennelTxnContext.getTxnHandleLong(FennelTxnContext.java:92)
        at net.sf.farrago.fennel.FennelTxnContext.initiateTxn(FennelTxnContext.java:77)
        at net.sf.farrago.db.FarragoDbSession.executeDdl(FarragoDbSession.java:821)
        at net.sf.farrago.db.FarragoDbSession.prepareImpl(FarragoDbSession.java:794)
        at net.sf.farrago.db.FarragoDbSession.prepare(FarragoDbSession.java:724)
        at net.sf.farrago.db.FarragoDbStmtContext.prepare(FarragoDbStmtContext.java:152)
        at net.sf.farrago.jdbc.engine.FarragoJdbcEngineStatement.executeUpdate(FarragoJdbcEngineStatement.java:134)
        at net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoTestCase.setUp(FarragoTestCase.java:412)
        at net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoTestCase.runCleanup(FarragoTestCase.java:200)
        at net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoTestCase.staticSetUp(FarragoTestCase.java:191)
        at net.sf.farrago.test.FarragoTestCase$1.setUp(FarragoTestCase.java:367)
        at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:18)
        at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)

dynamobi-build commented 12 years ago

[author="jvs", created="Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:01:03 -0500 (GMT-05:00)"] Whoops, sorry about that. Should be fixed by eigenchange 5055.