Open LuoZYi opened 11 months ago
Firstly, the UG or DG did not suggest that the duration of an appointment should be limited to a certain period. This is not a functionality bug as it doesn't follow the definition or examples given of a functionality bug provided on the course website.
Tester should read the course website for the exact definition and examples of functionality bugs:
The suggestion to limit appointment length is a valid one and is a feature flaw. Our group has not specified in our UG that appointment length is limited, and it does not hinder the normal usage of the application. Hence we suggest placing this under Not In Scope.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: This behaviour is not specified and it does differs from normal expectations as normal appointments cannot be 3 months long.
Appointments with length of 3 months are allowed, which are not feasible in real life.