Closed rljacob closed 9 years ago
I agree.
On Apr 30, 2015, at 5:52 PM, Robert Jacob notifications@github.com wrote:
Even though its an MPI 3.0 function, it would be very useful for identifying mpi-serial to other libraries, applications or configure systems.
Suggested by @quantheory.
� Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Does that mean you'll implement it? :)
Yes.
On Apr 30, 2015, at 18:26, Robert Jacob notifications@github.com wrote:
Does that mean you'll implement it? :)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
:dancer:
Once this is added I will update the CMake test.
Sean,
Were you hoping to have the string contain anything in particular? e.g. is "mpi-serial" sufficient ?
Ray
On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:39 PM, Sean Patrick Santos notifications@github.com wrote:
Once this is added I will update the CMake test.
� Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
I figured I'd leave it up to you. I think that any string that's unique to mpi-serial is fine, though you might also want to add a version number (e.g. "mpi-serial v2.0") just in case that becomes useful in the future).
I can hardcode the version like that but I don't know of an easy way to tie it to the git version - open to suggestions.
On May 2, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sean Patrick Santos notifications@github.com wrote:
I figured I'd leave it up to you. I think that any string that's unique to mpi-serial is fine, though you might also want to add a version number (e.g. "mpi-serial v2.0") just in case that becomes useful in the future).
� Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
I don't think we need to worry about that. It wouldn't help to link it to the hash so we just have to remember to update that string when a new version is tagged.
@rloy, how is this coming along?
I added that a few weeks back.
-Ray
On May 20, 2015, at 22:26, Robert Jacob notifications@github.com wrote:
@rloy, how is this coming along?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
https://github.com/MCSclimate/MCT/commit/4354ad6edabd94092ef0cc2c223fe88ec0854753
On May 20, 2015, at 10:26 PM, Robert Jacob notifications@github.com wrote:
@rloy, how is this coming along?
� Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Thanks! I must have missed that message.
Issue resolved by 4354ad6edabd94092ef0cc2c223fe88ec0854753
Even though its an MPI 3.0 function, it would be very useful for identifying mpi-serial to other libraries, applications or configure systems.
Suggested by @quantheory.