search

MSFREACH / msf-reach

Web platform for MSF-REACH
https://msf-reach.org/
4 stars 5 forks source link

field changes #653

Open LucieGueuning opened 5 years ago

LucieGueuning commented 5 years ago

"Medical Figures" should just be split into "Summary of MSF Intervention", which we fill fill out at the end of the intervention,

Mission contact person is there but it doesn't specify the event operator. Person in charge is vague. 2 fields: (1) mission contact person, and (2) REACH operator.

"Population Figures" which is necessary info at the very beginning.

"Response", should be "MSF Response"

In "Analysis of Capacity on the Ground" there is no need to put the options "medical" or " non-Medical".

Explo assessment should not be under extra details - Why explo assessment is under extra details

matthewberryman commented 5 years ago

@LucieGueuning These are not bugs (aside from some of the wording changes, which I will get onto soon) but changes from what's in the sheet, e.g. it still lists medical figures:

screenshot 2018-10-12 08 51 37

Fields on event open doesn't list population

screenshot 2018-10-12 08 53 11

(again, care is needed not to overload people and the population figures may come from country information which isn't available until event is opened and CIA Factbook / other country info is available). etc. Since, as previously discussed, field changes take a while and can be complicated to implement, we need to wait until we've got feedback from pilots before proceeding further with the (non-wording) changes.

matthewberryman commented 5 years ago

@LucieGueuning operator field done (supersedes previous request in 2b) - please review in test environment. Note that operator is set automatically on event creation.

LucieGueuning commented 5 years ago

What do you mean operator field done?

Please follow the shared file in drive for field definition

matthewberryman commented 5 years ago

There are now two fields per comment above: “1) mission contact person, and (2) REACH operator.”

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Nov 2018, at 05:32, Lucie Gueuning notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

What do you mean operator field done?

Please follow the shared file in drive for field definition

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MSFREACH/msf-reach/issues/653#issuecomment-438385414, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLqbkHiLdFJ5-Mwxmg_cxFTXVz6EudPks5uuxBQgaJpZM4XX8gK.

LucieGueuning commented 5 years ago

Please follow the file and not comments above. The file shared that I never stop referring to is the right reference one!

From: Matthew Berryman notifications@github.com Sent: 13 November 2018 19:04 To: MSFREACH/msf-reach msf-reach@noreply.github.com Cc: Lucie Gueuning lucie.gueuning@hongkong.msf.org; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [MSFREACH/msf-reach] field changes (#653)

There are now two fields per comment above: “1) mission contact person, and (2) REACH operator.”

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Nov 2018, at 05:32, Lucie Gueuning notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com%3cmailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:

What do you mean operator field done?

Please follow the shared file in drive for field definition

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MSFREACH/msf-reach/issues/653#issuecomment-438385414, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLqbkHiLdFJ5-Mwxmg_cxFTXVz6EudPks5uuxBQgaJpZM4XX8gK.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MSFREACH/msf-reach/issues/653#issuecomment-438396322, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYv9Q4FVRzdKJbpDaL6npOpUxKo_R944ks5uuxe1gaJpZM4XX8gK.

matthewberryman commented 5 years ago

Please follow the file and not comments above. The file shared that I never stop referring to is the right reference one!

Ok, can I suggest you keep consistency with the spreadsheet in future to minimise any errors.

I have updated the wording to be "REACH Operator" per the spreadsheet but can you please double check that as I thought we were using "MSF REACH" not "REACH" consistently per other discussions?

LucieGueuning commented 5 years ago

You are right for consistency but I won't change the wording again (for you to continue working on other deliverables). REACH operator is acceptable. For that specific operator field one: that's all good and working well. Only the order that is not followed but I guess it's coming with the field of info cleaned up.

Please follow carefully all the wordings and order for each field of information into the spreadsheet shared. Awaiting for the rest to be cleaned up as per shared spreadsheet.