Closed tesar-tech closed 2 weeks ago
I am not sure I understand the suggestion.
BugReportTemplate
action. What would be the benefit to do it in their own gh actions?dotnet build
into the BugReportTemplate
action. But I don't find it necessary - I somehow trust the Blazorise.Template
will produce "buildable" repo. The right place to test this is on the Blazorise.Template
side (but I understand the reality and this is really one line of code to add).Might be good to also update label action and mention that they can use new project template for reproducible.
https://github.com/Megabit/Blazorise/blob/master/.github/label-actions.yml
I am not sure I understand the suggestion.
- the repositories are generated - not in their own action, but in the
BugReportTemplate
action. What would be the benefit to do it in their own gh actions?- I can also add the
dotnet build
into theBugReportTemplate
action. But I don't find it necessary - I somehow trust theBlazorise.Template
will produce "buildable" repo. The right place to test this is on theBlazorise.Template
side (but I understand the reality and this is really one line of code to add).
No I meant the second option. It was just a double check, no harm I guess. But you're right about the right place to making sure Blazorise.Template is working correctly is on its own repository.
Description
Closes #5822
Multiple bug report repositories were created, one for each provider, with a central hub available here. The automation is managed by a GitHub Action.
For each provider, the action uses
Blazorise.Templates
to generate fresh, up-to-date code.It pushes the generated code to the corresponding Bug Report repository (e.g., BugReportBootstrap5). (so the provider repos are "orphaned")
Additionally, it copies the README, license, and
.gitignore
files to each repository.The README provides basic instructions on how to use the template.
The action runs daily to:
-f
flag and installing the newestBlazorise.Templates
version.