Closed westontrillium closed 3 years ago
The only tiny tiny comment I would make is that MobilityData standardized the naming of GTFS extensions, and that therefore we slightly tend to advocate to write "GTFS-Flex" instead of "GTFS-flex".
But this is tiny tiny, and thanks for putting together the proposal and assembling it. Great job!
I've shared a few thoughts in the email I sent you just a bit earlier @thomastrillium, but overall LGTM
Much appreciated and I have actually been thinking about this recently whenever I type GTFS-flex and GTFS-Fares next to one another :)
Weston could you make this update?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:37 PM Leo Frachet notifications@github.com wrote:
The only tiny tiny comment I would make is that MobilityData standardized the naming of GTFS extensions, and that therefore we slightly tend to advocate to write "GTFS-Flex" instead of "GTFS-flex".
But this is tiny tiny, and thanks for putting together the proposal and assembling it. Great job!
I've shared a few thoughts in the email I sent you just a bit earlier @thomastrillium https://github.com/thomastrillium, but overall LGTM
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MobilityData/gtfs-flex/pull/42#issuecomment-719756769, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZ6ZNHOIBBH3ZURW43YPULSNMIW7ANCNFSM4S2OHVTQ .
@thomastrillium Capitalization change made to README.md.
@scmcca I don't think I have the creds to merge this PR. Is that something you could go ahead and do?
All committers have signed the CLA.