Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'm either misunderstanding the problem you're describing, or I'm not seeing it
here.
I created the following test document:
\documentclass{tufte-handout}
\usepackage{microtype}
\begin{document}
\newthought{Hello }world!
\newthought{Hello} world!
\end{document}
And both \newthought lines are shown the same way in the resulting PDF. (I ran
this
through pdflatex.)
If this isn't what you meant, can you provide a short example demonstrating the
problem?
Thanks!
Original comment by godbyk@gmail.com
on 15 May 2009 at 5:34
The following test document produced the output in the attached file, using
TeXShop 2.26 (released March
2009) on OS X Tiger 10.4. If you want me to look into the specific versions of
any packages, let me know. As
you can see I am experiencing the problem described above.
\documentclass{tufte-book} % r94
\usepackage{microtype}
\begin{document}
\newthought{Hello }world!
\newthought{Hello} world!
\end{document}
Regards,
Lars
Original comment by lars.ron...@anchormodeling.com
on 15 May 2009 at 7:13
Attachments:
Lars--
That's strange. I'm not seeing that here. Can you send me the Tufte.log file?
If
you add the 'debug' option to the document class:
\documentclass[debug]{tufte-book}
then it will dump out some more debug info to the log file.
Thanks!
Original comment by godbyk@gmail.com
on 15 May 2009 at 7:29
Here's a section from the log file that looks suspicious:
Package microtype Info: Character `029' is missing
(microtype) in font `T1/pplj/m/sc/10'.
(microtype) Ignoring protrusion settings for this character.
Could it be related to the Palatino font?
Regards,
Lars
Original comment by lars.ron...@anchormodeling.com
on 15 May 2009 at 4:12
Attachments:
Hello, Lars.
I was revisiting this bug and wondered if you were still experiencing these
problems.
I've not yet been able to reproduce it.
Thanks!
--Kevin
Original comment by godbyk@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2009 at 1:15
Fix committed in r134 per Dan Abell. Thanks, Dan!
Original comment by godbyk@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2009 at 1:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lars.ron...@anchormodeling.com
on 12 May 2009 at 4:28