Provision to set session parameters

[mnfarooqi]

Closes #96

• Added function QDMI_session_set_parameter to set session parameters
• Added enum QDMI_SESSION_PARAMETER_T to be used as parameter to QDMI_session_set_parameter
• Added two enum values QDMI_SESSION_PARAMETER_OWNER and QDMI_SESSION_PARAMETER_TOKEN to QDMI_SESSION_PARAMETER_T to be used for access control within a session.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #100     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage     86.0%   86.6%   +0.5%     
=========================================
  Files            7       7             
  Lines          798     815     +17     
  Branches       201     204      +3     
=========================================
+ Hits           687     706     +19     
+ Misses         111     109      -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cpp	86.6% <100.0%> (+0.5%)	:arrow_up:

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
examples/driver/qdmi_example_driver.cpp	83.6% <100.0%> (+3.8%)	:arrow_up:

[mnfarooqi]

This is really great! Thanks for the PR 🙏🏼 I have no comments on the actual additions in the PR. They look very clean. I have one request though: could we add a default implementation of the new function to the example driver? The session struct could just add a owner and token string member and use the new function to set them. Based on that example implementation, a test could be added for actually using the new method to set these parameters.

Already implemented will push it in the next commit.

I am not quite sure how far we want to take this in the examples, but I could imagine it would be useful if the new session information were actually to be used in the get_devices method for selecting which devices to return so that the new values are not only set, but also used in the examples. Let me know if you think that is taking it too far for now.

Working on it too.

[burgholzer]

This is really great! Thanks for the PR 🙏🏼 I have no comments on the actual additions in the PR. They look very clean. I have one request though: could we add a default implementation of the new function to the example driver? The session struct could just add a owner and token string member and use the new function to set them. Based on that example implementation, a test could be added for actually using the new method to set these parameters.

Already implemented will push it in the next commit.

I am not quite sure how far we want to take this in the examples, but I could imagine it would be useful if the new session information were actually to be used in the get_devices method for selecting which devices to return so that the new values are not only set, but also used in the examples. Let me know if you think that is taking it too far for now.

Working on it too.

Awesome! Many thanks 🙏🏼