Open RokeJulianLockhart opened 2 months ago
I've thought about it too. But the way the feature was implemented, it's not possible to implement such a functionality in a simple way. It's probably possible to merged the first three tables into one in order to make it easier to search across the settings.
Sometimes, which table a known key is stored within isn't known, meaning that the user must choose each table and attempt the query individually. This isn't feasible with the amount of tables individually exposed: