Closed faroit closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the detailed review. I've merged the corresponding pull request.
@BreezeWhite sorry, but this wasn't related to #48.
@faroit oops, sorry for that :joy: I've fixed the issue according to your suggestion, and additionally checked other inconsistency in the bibliography. Changes can be viewed from the commit.
looks good. Thanks! :-)
I found inconsistencies in the bibliography when it comes e.g. Proceedings of ISMIR. I suggest to have all bib entries use:
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3391