Open StroemPhi opened 1 year ago
Our authoritative sources: CHMO, ISO18115:3 and CHARISMA, contain an overview of Raman sub-techniques (assays).
Neither of these is complete nor strictly coherent. Therefore it is our task to establish a classification of techniques and include it into VIBSO (or propose it to CHMO).
To put order within the jungle, we need to define some positive criteria, e.g.:
as well as some negative criteria:
unsure:
The combination techniques should be included axiomatically, by allowing instances to belong to more classes:
# An example of surface-enhanced anti-Stokes confocal Raman spectroscopy
ex:Measurement1 rdf:type vibso:RamanSpec_SurfaceEnhanced , # implies parameters about the surface
vibso:RamanSpec_AntiStokes , # implies a restriction on Raman shifts <0
vibso:RamanSpec_Confocal . # implies parameters on the focal depth...
Thanks @Zack-83, I put it on the agenda for tomorrow to be discussed.
Please change "emitted" photon with "exiting" photon (or something similar). Emission usually refers to a single-photon phenomenon in which an excited state decays with emission of a photon.
As discussed, we prefer to define the full hierarchy tree starting from "Raman spectroscopy" (an assay) rather than "Raman scattering" (a phenomenon)
Some comments after the call today.
This issue addresses the need to have classes in VIBSO that represent the various Raman spectroscopy assay types defined in the ISO18115:3 specs.
How we will do this is described in the below comment by@Zack-83.
In Raman.methods.ISO.CHMO.CHARISMA.xlsx we edit the proposed definitions, the priority of which terms from our sources to include, what superclasses they have and other information about them. If you want to add a comment or propose a change in it, please download the most current version attached here and add then upload your version in a new comment below.
A visual overview is also offered: