The current process_hms takes variable argument to return each variable's aggregated polygons. As introduced today's meeting, when overlapping polygons with different levels exist, a certain point location would have 1s across different level fields (light_0, medium_0, heavy_0). I propose to take all levels into account in process_hms. I think that potential changes will not require manuscript editing since we did not include this detail in it. I'd be working on refactoring as it is closely related to beethoven work and needs to be resolved as soon as possible.
The current
process_hms
takesvariable
argument to return each variable's aggregated polygons. As introduced today's meeting, when overlapping polygons with different levels exist, a certain point location would have 1s across different level fields (light_0
,medium_0
,heavy_0
). I propose to take all levels into account inprocess_hms
. I think that potential changes will not require manuscript editing since we did not include this detail in it. I'd be working on refactoring as it is closely related tobeethoven
work and needs to be resolved as soon as possible.Would this work for you @mitchellmanware ?