Open JMSnyder1980 opened 1 year ago
Are you using the ww3_grid.inp or ww3_grid.nml? You only need one.
Also, how does your mask file look like? Looking at the output of your ww3_grid execution, it looks like you have 3s around the 180th meridian. 3 means "excluded point", is that what you want?
At least in the grid.nml, I see your closure wrong. It should be SMPL. And the other user us right, do not put both nml and inp in your work directory. You need just one.
Are you using the ww3_grid.inp or ww3_grid.nml? You only need one.
Also, how does your mask file look like? Looking at the output of your ww3_grid execution, it looks like you have 3s around the 180th meridian. 3 means "excluded point", is that what you want? No it is not want I want. I am trying to eliminate those since when I display output I get a big gap at around 180. I do not want that. This gets eliminated when I using SMPL instead of the NONE but then the nested runs no longer work. Please refer to discussion #993 or issue #994 for this problem. How can I run the ww3 nests successfully without dealing with "excluded points" along the 180 boundary for the global run?
At least in the grid.nml, I see your closure wrong. It should be SMPL. And the other user us right, do not put both nml and inp in your work directory. You need just one.
i have put in SMPL but then the boundary conditions for nests do not pass properly. I wind up getting errors with sea points. See issue #994 or discussion #993. How can I resolve this issue?
Discussed in https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/WW3/discussions/989