Open WalterKolczynski-NOAA opened 3 years ago
@HuiyaChuang-NOAA Who should we assign this issue to?
@HuiyaChuang-NOAA Who should we assign this issue to?
I believe Jason has in mind that his new Fed hire (announced by Brian today) will take over GFS downstream packages. Jason will return to work next week and I will confirm this with him.
Huiya
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA and @aerorahul,
Where to find the following scripts?
post_processing/awips_g2/jgfs_awips_g2_fHHH.ecf post_processing/awips_20km_1p0/jgfs_awips_fHHH.ecf
I don't see a post_processing subdirectory under global-workflow or a post_processing repository under NOAA-EMC. Please provide more details on this issue and the paths/links to the scripts.
Thanks, Gwen
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA and @aerorahul,
Where to find the following scripts?
post_processing/awips_g2/jgfs_awips_g2_fHHH.ecf post_processing/awips_20km_1p0/jgfs_awips_fHHH.ecf
I don't see a post_processing subdirectory under global-workflow or a post_processing repository under NOAA-EMC. Please provide more details on this issue and the paths/links to the scripts.
Thanks, Gwen
The master scripts located in https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/blob/develop/ecf/scripts/gfs/atmos/post_processing/awips_g2/jgfs_atmos_awips_g2_master.ecf https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/blob/develop/ecf/scripts/gfs/atmos/post_processing/awips_20km_1p0/jgfs_atmos_awips_master.ecf together with https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/blob/develop/ecf/setup_ecf_links.sh is used to create the above hour specific ecf job cards.
Thanks, @aerorahul! So, you want me to remove Line 43 in https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/blob/develop/ecf/scripts/gfs/atmos/post_processing/awips_g2/jgfs_atmos_awips_g2_master.ecf, and Line 39 in https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/blob/develop/ecf/scripts/gfs/atmos/post_processing/awips_20km_1p0/jgfs_atmos_awips_master.ecf, correct?
There is another request to change the filename. What is the correct format of filename that should be used? Also, changing filename may affect downstream products ingesting the data files. Has that effect been considered?
Jen Yang 2020-12-28 21:35:32 UTC Currently in both gfs v15 (current production) or gfs V16 (30 days parallel), some wmo files are with job name inside the file name, this would cause some inconsistency when job name change in the upgrade. Please fix this to remove the job name from the file name in the next upgrade.
Here is some example wmo file name that contain the job name (or partial job name): grib2.awpgfs036.003.gfs_awips_f036_1p0deg_00 grib2.awpgfs_20km_ak_f036.gfs_awips_f036_00 grib2.awpgfs_20km_conus_f036.gfs_awips_f036_00 grib2.awpgfs_20km_pac_f036.gfs_awips_f036_00 grib2.awpgfs_20km_prico_f036.gfs_awips_f036_00 xtrn.awpgfs036.211.gfs_awips_f036_00
com.wafs0036.gfs_atmos_wafs_f36_00 xtrn.wfsgfs0036.gfs_atmos_wafs_f36_00
Also, the ecflow scripts for the following awips scripts need to update to remove the line for the job definition. It should take the value from BSUB -J line.
post_processing/awips_g2/jgfs_awips_g2_fHHH.ecf (remove line :export job="jgfs_awipsf${fcsthrs}${cyc}" )
post_processing/awips_20km_1p0/jgfs_awips_fHHH.ecf (remove line; export job=jgfs_awipsf%FCSTHR%%CYC%)
Refs: Bugzilla #1155