Closed fzy139 closed 11 months ago
Thanks,
No, the current code base assumes a regular tet grid. As you suggest, it should be possible to experiment with both uniform and non-uniform subdivisions, following the DMTet paper, but that is not supported in the current code base. Feel free to explore it!
I see. I've tried to apply the current dmtet code to irregular tet grids. It can still extract reasonable surfaces but there are lots of isolated faces inside the extracted mesh. Could you please give me some hints about how to modify the current dmtet code to work with irregular tet grids?
Thanks
Hi @fzy139, MT cannot guarantee a watertight output with an irregular grid. In the original DMTet paper, we subdivide all surface tets (tets with different signs at the corners) and their one-ring neighbors. The unsubdivided cells are discarded, so the new grid remains "regular" in the sense that all cells have the same subdivision level. If you're planning to further optimize the SDF after subdivision, it's important to ensure there is no sign change at the grid boundary to avoid creating open surfaces. To achieve this, you can fix the SDF values at the grid boundary immediately after subdivision.
Thanks! Very helpful. I'll have a try.
Hi,
Thanks for your excellent work.
I wonder if the current DMTet implementation supports irregular tet grids, e.g. after subdivision of a subset of tets, so that it can produce more detailed geometry like the original DMTet paper shows.
Thanks