Closed staplegun closed 5 years ago
Searchable as a separate field additionalType
: https://csapi-test.nma.gov.au/object?additionalType=prints
This is OK as is, but noting (if you can confirm) that the AdditionalType is using the EMU field TitObjectName rather than TitSecondaryObjectType?
And at some stage, we would also like to include an additional additional type, as some objects have the TitSecondaryObjectType populated. I will add that as a separate issue/task.
Both TitObjectName
and TitSecondaryObjectType
are going into the same field: crm:P2_has_type
in JSON-LD, which goes into additionalType
in simple format.
For example: https://csapi-test.nma.gov.au/apiexplorer.html?id=object/230903
OK great, already done! I can see this in the DC format. However, I cannot find where the additional types are referenced in the linked art version... what am I looking for?
https://csapi-test.nma.gov.au/object/230903?format=json-ld
See 'classified_as'
Adds more typing information, from EMu
TitSecondaryObjectType
field.