Open seqizz opened 3 years ago
Is it possible that these patches became upstream in one way or the other? Maybe we can drop the whole custom kernel thing.
Maybe you and @mitchmindtree could both post the wifi chipset that was used. Most patches seems to be related to this.
Aaah makes sense. Looks like there are 2 different variants of wifi on this model. Mine is indeed AX201:
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (rev 20)
Since there is no "if" we can use, should I send my version with -ax201 suffix?
@seqizz we might be better off creating a module option (see here for info about module structure) for specifying either one in the configuration.
Honestly I don't have much experience with modules, will check it out. Hopefully there is an example in the repo already.
I would add an option to enable AX500 support and deprecate it once mainline supports this wifi chipset.
This is an example for a module option:
Hi, I saw the related config but I didn't need any of those when I use
boot.kernelPackages = pkgs.linuxPackages_latest;
. So my question is, is this the same hardware? If not I'd also like to add config for this model, maybe suffixing with "2-in-1". My result is:Maybe @mitchmindtree ?