Closed azimov closed 2 years ago
Merging #7 (c446b50) into develop (ec17488) will increase coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.:exclamation: Current head c446b50 differs from pull request most recent head 26a848c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 26a848c to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #7 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 86.84% 86.87% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 1574 1577 +3
===========================================
+ Hits 1367 1370 +3
Misses 207 207
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/Plots.R | 95.27% <100.00%> (+0.02%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ec17488...26a848c. Read the comment docs.
I agree there should be flexibility in picking the limits of the scale, but I would prefer the user is allowed to pick the limits, rather than deriving them from the data. As a general rule, in a report or paper you would like all plots to use the same axis, which is not possible if the axis varies per input data. So maybe just add a limits
argument to the plot function?
(actually, we should probably add xLimits
and yLimits
Fixes #6