Closed Rombur closed 4 years ago
Both are valid comment and they are actually fixed in my branch that uses the callback
mechanic. This PR just update ArborX, I would prefer that we wait for the callback
PR to fix these comments.
retest this please
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
master@edfa050
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #563 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 95.88%
=========================================
Files ? 86
Lines ? 6009
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 5762
Misses ? 247
Partials ? 0
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...ckages/Discretization/src/DTK_PointSearch_decl.hpp | 100% <ø> (ø) |
|
...oudProblemGenerator/ExodusProblemGenerator_def.hpp | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
...ackages/Discretization/src/DTK_PointSearch_def.hpp | 99.23% <100%> (ø) |
|
...ree/src/DTK_DetailsNearestNeighborOperatorImpl.hpp | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
.../src/DTK_DetailsMovingLeastSquaresOperatorImpl.hpp | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
...s/Meshfree/test/tstDetailsCommunicationHelpers.cpp | 98.01% <100%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update edfa050...99f0a0e. Read the comment docs.
I think this is ready to be merged. The fixes Damien wants will be done in a later PR where we use the new callback mechanism.
Update to use the current master of arborx and add a couple fixes that are necessary to build DTK