OpenEnergyPlatform / ontology

Repository for the Open Energy Ontology (OEO)
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
105 stars 19 forks source link

Exergy, anergy and entropy #1166

Open l-emele opened 2 years ago

l-emele commented 2 years ago

Description of the issue

In some definitions, we have phrases like "useful" or "usable" energy/heat. The more stringent term here would probably be exergy. If there is usable energy, then there is also unusable energy, this is often called anergy. Related and probably needed to define anergy and exergy is entropy.

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exergy

Ideas of solution

If you already have ideas for the solution describe them here

Workflow checklist

I am aware that

l-emele commented 2 years ago

Some definitions and explanations from other sources as start of discussion:

exergy:

anergy:

l-emele commented 2 years ago

Btw, we also already have a class waste thermal energy (alt. waste heat): Waste thermal energy is thermal energy that is the physical output of an energy transformation process and that is released into the environment unused. This might be equivalent or is at least related to anergy.

robbiemorrison commented 2 years ago

It is a while since I worked with exergy. But it divides into chemical exergy and physical exergy. The former interacts with the chemical dead state of the environment and the latter with the thermal dead state of the environment and at rest. The two can be added but that is not usually necessary. The chemical/physical observation explains the divergence in the definitions given above. Also anergy is thermodynamically useless whereas waste heat may only be economically or technically useless. Waste heat often possesses low grade exergy: grade or energy quality being the ratio between exergy and anergy. Work is 100% by definition, solar irradiation about 93% (from memory), and waste heat just a few percent. Chemical work is also a construct in this scheme.

I think anergy and exergy are concepts. And waste thermal energy a label (without diving into the recent EU taxonomy debacle which classified gas turbines as sustainable). And both strands need supporting.

Note that the chemical dead state is a fiction or at least an approximation: the environment is not usually in full technical chemical equilibrium.