OpenGATE / Gate

Official public repository of Gate
http://www.opengatecollaboration.org
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
236 stars 263 forks source link

64Cu positron spectra problem #312

Closed Tien-Phong-PHAM closed 3 years ago

Tien-Phong-PHAM commented 4 years ago

Dear Gate-users,

I’m trying to simulate the energy spectrum of a Cu-64 source using the ion definition in GATE v8.2, but i have a problem with the positron emission spectra. In fact, the energy distribution with my ion source is very different with spectral definition in the low energy region. I mean the energy spectrum of positron is similar to the energy spectrum of electron.

In this case, i just used the « RadioactiveDecay » as physics list

I would like to ask if someone has experience with ion type source can help me.

Many thanks for your help !

Spectrum Cu64

BishopWolf commented 4 years ago

I think you just used the «RadioactiveDecay» as physics list. You also need to consider daughter decay using also the «Decay»

just add

                #=====================================================
                # Physic List Mechanism
                #=====================================================

                /gate/physics/addPhysicsList    emstandard_opt4
                /gate/physics/addProcess RadioactiveDecay
                /gate/physics/addProcess Decay
dsarrut commented 3 years ago

Hi, thanks Alex. Tien-Phong-PHAM: is it solved now ?

Tien-Phong-PHAM commented 3 years ago

Hi David,

It's not the question of the physics list but a bug on version 8.2 I think because I don't see this problem with version 9.

Sincerely Tien-Phong PHAM

Le jeu. 17 déc. 2020 à 08:11, David Sarrut notifications@github.com a écrit :

Hi, thanks Alex. Tien-Phong-PHAM: is it solved now ?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenGATE/Gate/issues/312#issuecomment-747257744, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOPOLKFCZONDAIT7JSXONA3SVGVIZANCNFSM4K7EMGJA .

dsarrut commented 3 years ago

Hi, sorry, I think the issue was not clear for me ... can you be a bit more specific, please? What did you obtain and what are you expecting? Also, is the problem solved with the current version? thanks!