Plot Simulation Results w/ Streamlit

[achimstruve]

Create the plot implementation of the retrieved simulation data after we solved issue #37.

Let us start by implementing all plots that are already being done by the spreadsheet model.

[BlockBoy32]

Initial time plots made, some observations:

• Some of the analysis plots look like the numbers might be off, like Price vs Volatility, the visuals look like something is wrong
• We might need an input int he function for units on the axis and there should be a way to name the values on the axis, otherwise they just show all of the parameter names and it looks kinda weird.

@achimstruve we can chat about it more on our next call. I made a plot_all() function that does jus that as of now. Not sure if there is another more efficient way to display it on these interfaces. It is not a strong suit of mine nor a huge point of interest.

[BlockBoy32]

I made a new table in our DB for sys_param so we can use that data for some of our pie plots.

[BlockBoy32]

• [x] Create mapping for user friendly names for output data
• [x] Fix effective pricing

[achimstruve]

I just revamped the whole UI as follows:

• Added UI level input options
• Added multi-page approach
• Added sidebar and more formatting

These are some more to-do's apart from the things you flagged in the post before:

• Create mapping between input parameter and result databases for fast toggling between already done simulation results
• Add more UI level input options similar to the new parameter input implementation

I will continue on these last two bits.

[achimstruve]

Today I solved the point Create mapping between input parameter and result databases for fast toggling between already done simulation results.

[achimstruve]

The following input parts are still missing for the Streamlit frontend.

• [x] User Adoption
• [x] Business Assumptions
• [x] Utility Modules

The challenging part is to build it in a way that it abstracts the complexity away from the user. This requires some common sense and creativity in designing the inputs while still maintaining compatibility to the underlying model and original parameter set definition. Please refer to the already existing implementations for more tangible examples of what I mean by this.

Currently I am working on the User Adoption inputs. It would be great if someone could pick up one or two of the other input sections. Please post it down below if you want to commit to one of those.

[BlockBoy32]

I can take a look at the utility modules, I might get time this week but a better expectation would be early next week.

[achimstruve]

Reopened this as it is not finished yet. @BlockBoy32

[BlockBoy32]

https://github.com/OutlierVentures/QTM-Interface/assets/99607108/1a4f8c84-96b0-4516-ada2-9651aaac6cb1

i think this is the direction I am going to head in

[achimstruve]

I finished the User Adoption and Business Assumptions inputs. The only thing missing now is the utilities.

It would be great you can finalize it this week @BlockBoy32.

If you can't push your current state and I'll finish it later this week.

[BlockBoy32]

I will put some work on it and push the current state today/tomorrow

[BlockBoy32]

Hey actually I will not be able to get to it by the end of the week. Let me know if you would like to wait for me or not.

[achimstruve]

Could you push the work you did so far? I can continue it this week. cc.: @BlockBoy32

[BlockBoy32]

I pushed it

[achimstruve]

Okay thanks! I picked it up and rebuilt the whole utility section.

The first iteration of the UI should be finished now.