Closed VojtaStanek closed 8 years ago
Does this render name of the task in which the error occurred?
No, it doesn't. Do you think it would be better to use failed package's name as a name for the error?
I just want to make sure that it's easy to debug, since the originating task can get lost in asynchronous errors. That's why the original error included e.task
.
Maybe simply change the first argument to 'run-sequence(' + e.task + ')'
. That should at least help in debugging the error.
Agree! Changed!
Thanks!
I assume you meant to replace the line, rather than duplicate it? ;-)
Fix that, and I'll get this merged in and published!
Oh, yes. ;)
Story: Why did I duplicated it? Because I edited it, but atom removed some whitespaces from empty lines, so I had to stage&commit it in GUI (GitKraken), where I staged the adding, but forgot to stage the removal. ;)
Awesome, thanks!
The update is published as v1.2.0
fixes #65