Closed jhpoelen closed 5 years ago
Hi Jorrit,
Many thanks for flagging these dois up. They will be manually corrected in our excel spreadsheet for our future phi4.7 release.
Please let us know if you come across any more doi errors so that they can also be corrected.
FYI, in the future we are planning to capture PHI-base data using an author curation tool which is currently under development called PHI-Canto. This will help to reduce these occasional errors.
Hi @CuzickA @martin2urban - Just a reminder that some funny looking DOIs still exist in phi-base_current.tsv (https://github.com/PHI-base/data/commit/79332e332f978bfab429ae3063e067cf0a9dd140) -
funny DOIs |
---|
10.1073pnas.0901477106 |
no data found |
10.1073pnas.0711014105 |
10.1073ypnas.051624298 |
<U+200B>10.<U+200B>1105/<U+200B>tpc.<U+200B>12.<U+200B>11.<U+200B>2019 |
M-2001-0110-03R |
Hope this helps!
Thanks @jhpoelen that is really helpful. Updates will be made for our phi4.7 release due in May 2019.
Hi! I just stumbled across some funny looking dois in the phi-base_current.csv . Examples include: